Category: Europe

  • Why writing letters to the press is so useful……

    Why writing letters to the press is so useful……

    In a recent blog I mentioned the value of writing to the media to get more people aware of the advantages of CF&D and that we have set up a media team. A CCL Europe member, Brigitte van Gerven, has just written a very good explanation of why CCL Europe is planning to do the same…….

     The goal is to establish a good relationship with the mainstream press and other media, make the carbon fee and dividend and CCL more well known among journalists, and to get articles, letters, and opinion pieces published in the mainstream media…..

    When we go lobbying politicians their reactions are generally positive, we have their respect and we come across as people who know what they are talking about. But there are still some barriers which make politicians hesitate to go a step further and support CF&D.

    1.    CF&D should become more well known
    2.    CF&D should be broadly supported by the public
    3.    CF&D should be more credible e.g. backed up by experts and studies
    4.    CF&D should be perceived as feasible within the EU context

    The media group can contribute significantly to 1. and 2. and therefore advance our cause. An article in the mainstream press genuinely attracts the attention of politicians and makes them take notice. Even more ideal would be if we succeed in starting a public discussion about the CF&D in the media.

    If you would like to join our media team – just drop a note to [email protected].

  • A good argument for Carbon Fee and Dividend by a Free Marketeer

    A good argument for Carbon Fee and Dividend by a Free Marketeer

    Ambrose Pritchard, writing in The Telegraph criticises the proposed Democrat Green Deal as being a dirigiste policy with an ulterior motive of ‘fuelling’ the trade war with China. He gives a very cogent explanation of the mechanics of carbon fee and dividend and why he prefers this market led method of carbon pricing. He also argues why the dividend should go directly to consumers…

    Mr Biden’s new age Gosplan is not to my taste. Should the Democrats be pledging to install 500 million solar panels and 60,000 wind turbines over the next four years? Is such dirigiste planning the American way?

    The laissez faire way is to set a carbon price that ratchets up predictably, letting business respond to the price signal, and letting Schumpeterian competition find its own answers. All former chairmen of the Federal Reserve and a cast of economists of all ideological stripes have backed HR 763, a bipartisan House bill for a carbon tax and dividend.  

    It starts at $15 a tonne and ratchets up $10 every year until CO2 emissions are almost eliminated. The money raised is rotated back into people’s pockets. The higher the carbon price, the bigger the cheque, and the poor do best. 

    Needless to say, Ursula von der Leyen’s variant in Europe aims to siphon off its carbon tax to fund the Commission’s apparatus. The EU seems to have learned little from the gilets jaunes and the sociology of revolt. 

  • Climate change is a problem of injustice

    Climate change is a problem of injustice

    Climate change is essentially a problem of injustice. People are not sufficiently aware of this. Worse still, the theme of justice and responsibility is anxiously avoided in the climate debate. And when it is discussed the focus is on individual responsibility, ignoring the fact that there are people in positions of power who bear an infinitely greater burden of guilt. After all, those who help to maintain an unjust system are surely much more guilty than those who only do their best to live/survive in this system, aren’t they? But as has often been shown, exploiting guilt is a very efficient tactic for silencing people and allowing the impasse to continue. Very little has been achieved in 25 years, and global annual CO2 emissions continue to rise, precisely because this injustice is not being addressed:

    (more…)
  • Climate change is a problem of injustice

    Climate change is a problem of injustice

    Climate change is essentially a problem of injustice. People are not sufficiently aware of this. Worse still, the theme of justice and responsibility is anxiously avoided in the climate debate. And when it is discussed the focus is on individual responsibility, ignoring the fact that there are people in positions of power who bear an infinitely greater burden of guilt. After all, those who help to maintain an unjust system are surely much more guilty than those who only do their best to live/survive in this system, aren’t they? But as has often been shown, exploiting guilt is a very efficient tactic for silencing people and allowing the impasse to continue. Very little has been achieved in 25 years, and global annual CO2 emissions continue to rise, precisely because this injustice is not being addressed:

    Fossil fuel companies make billions of dollars, while their business is killing the planet, but they do not pay for the damage caused. It is the ordinary people who will suffer the consequences of climate change. It is the ordinary people who will have to pay the bill.

    We will have to pay in so many ways. Higher food prices. Damage to our homes from storms, floods and other extreme weather conditions. Deaths from heat waves. Extinction of plant and animal species. A sharp increase in the number of forest fires. Loss of our coastal cities due to rising sea levels. But also: we pay with a loss of happiness. Living in the knowledge that we are destroying our planet is hard to bear.

    This injustice continues, only to make a small group of extremely rich people even richer. It is effectively a transfer of money from the poor to the rich.

    There is a climate policy that can put an end to this injustice: the carbon fee and dividend. By making the big polluters pay for the damage they cause, and by giving that money back to the people, we reverse the money transfer and we restore the balance. When the balance is restored, the world will no longer choose the profits of a few super-rich to the detriment of the losses of billions of ordinary people. Then we will finally get rid of fossil fuels and stop climate change.

    You don’t have to take my word for it. Practically every economist in the world says the same thing: a carbon fee and dividend is essential to get climate change under control. In their words, it is correcting the biggest market failure in history. In January, 3,500 economists, including 27 Nobel Prize winners, published an open letter to advocate a carbon fee and dividend. If we listen to the experts, to the climate scientists, on climate change, is it not logical that we also take the advice of the experts – in other words, the economists – on climate policy into account?

    Recently, a few concerned European citizens set up a citizens’ committee and submitted a European Citizens’ Initiative  on the introduction of a carbon fee and dividend at the EU level. We need to collect a million signatures in one year to defend our proposal in the European Parliament.

    The price of the carbon caused by climate change must and will rise. Pollution can no longer be free. The carbon fee and dividend does this in a fair and transparent way, while putting real money in *your* pocket. Please help fight both climate change and injustice by taking 30 seconds to present this urgent, fair and important policy to the European Commission. Please share this message with everyone you know. Thank you.

  • Carbon pricing after Brexit

    Carbon pricing after Brexit

    The Government has been asking people to submit ideas for what kind of carbon pricing we should put in place when we leave the European Union.

    At the moment we are part of the European Union’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) and we also have our own carbon tax, the Carbon Price Floor (CPF), that comes into play when the fluctuating EU ETS price drops below £18 per tonne.

    (more…)